this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
131 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
347 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/JxZih

Also the source data since news articles seem to hate including them: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240613/dq240613a-eng.htm

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Imagine paying over $1000 for rent every month, except that if you decide to move, you (theoretically) get that money back, and (likely) even more.

Now imagine that same $1000 going to someone else and you never see it again.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

1000$ in rent! Where are you living that is so cheap?

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I did go a bit low. My actual rent is more than that.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

One of these days, a banana is actually going to cost that, and then this joke will no longer work. Hopefully not for decades though.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

A basement suite in rural Saskatchewan. I'm guessing that's about the going rate.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how that addresses what I said in my comment?

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not disagreeing with your comment btw. I was speaking to your question about the title.

In the eyes of a renter, homeowners are rich. It's (unfortunately) an amazing investment with a very high barrier to entry.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Funny enough, real estate preforms worse than just an index fund, usually. The difference is that a mortgage makes not regularly paying in much more difficult.

But yeah, the underclass tends to rent.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The other differences are leverage, tax sheltering, and the low cost of borrowing. How many people can borrow $1,500,000 at 5% to buy an index fund in a tax shielded account?

Also, don’t forget that you get to “invest” your rent money when you buy a home.

Real estate returns are higher.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, but the return rate for stocks over the last century has been 10% per annum. I'm not making it up, this is what an actual financial advisor will tell you about the relative performance of real estate and investing, and why one or the other might be right for you.

You shouldn't really be leveraging yourself to buy into an index fund. If you can buy a house outright that's also a better deal than a mortgage.

[–] Lobreeze@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

So you want everyone to rent?