this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
286 points (95.8% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2825 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 52 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It wouldn’t be a big loss. That painting is ugly as hell.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 76 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think it's a terrific representation of the horrifically bloody history of the British Monarchy

[–] Leg@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I don't think it was meant to be pretty lol

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I know the artist said some other bullshit to justify this choice, but to me it just looks like the blood their wealth was built on.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I like it because it's hella odd as shit. King, embrace the fuck-my-shit-up results of this glorious piece.

[–] Aviandelight@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I can't stop thinking about how someone got paid to make this painting.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He's pretty famous for making portraits. Here's his portrait of Idris Elba.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

See, that isn’t ugly.

Which makes me think it was on purpose. Which makes me hate it a little less.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

He has a lot of upper class clients who he paints just as ... starkly as the king's portrait.

It is very much on purpose.

[–] Aviandelight@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

Now that is a gorgeous balance of color and brush strokes. So why did the artist choose that awful color theme for Charles?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Right? Spit right in the royal families face and they pay you for the privilege. Priceless and hilarious

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago