this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
529 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly two in five (37 percent) managers, directors, and executives believe their organization enacted layoffs in the last year because fewer employees than they expected quit during their RTO. And their beliefs are well-founded: One in four (25 percent) VP and C-suite executives and one in five (18 percent) HR pros admit they hoped for some voluntary turnover during an RTO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why ends up happening is you skim the top employees and are left with the bottom of the barrel that performs even worse because they are in a state of fear and discomfort.

Sounds like the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result (keeping the best, getting rid of the rest)

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's not the definition of insanity.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

It's not, but it's a common phrase and brings up a fair point even if the wrong way.

[–] aisteru@lemmy.aisteru.ch 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I know, it's actually much older than that but it still drives me crazy when people say that for some reason.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

"Incompetence" would also fit the bill.