this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
622 points (96.0% liked)

Political Memes

5232 readers
1925 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
622
"we" the "people" (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

no one fucking told me about states banning RCV during all that yapping on here about how i should VOTE THIRD PARTY OR ELSE IM COMPLICIT in the DNCs CRIMES

it may or may not be joever, very blackpilled at this moment

edit it’s actually 10 states. 5 in the past two months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Since when was Mohammed Bin Salman a constitutional monarch?

Since the King ratified the Basic Law of Governance in 1992.

I may as well show how Vladimir Putin is an example of why a democratically elected president is a bad idea.

Relabel him a Constitutional Monarch, though. Suddenly he's a good idea again?

The advantage with a monarch is that you’re rolling the dice every 20-30 years (70 in the case of Elizabeth II)

How is that any different from a popular president operating without term limits? Or a popular party that consistently holds the majority of seats in government?

Is the little gold hat adding something I can't see? Or do you just like the pomp and circumstance of royalty?

With an elected president it’s unpredictable

The French spent nearly a century jumping back and forth between popular revolution and bourbon restoration. Was that more predictable?

How about the War of the Roses? Or the numerous Seljuk wars of succession in Iraq and Persia? Or the Taiping Rebellion?

Inflexible monarchies prompted each of these social catastrophes.

The Roman Imperial Era was rife with instability, with Rome violently changing hands multiple times in a given year.

That's far more unpredictable than a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Trump-Biden hand off, particularly when so much of the "deep state" doesn't really change.