this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
202 points (65.3% liked)

Comic Strips

12048 readers
1613 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] livjq@lemmy.world 81 points 3 months ago (32 children)

To all of the people saying this is sad, not all relationships have to last forever.

It's okay to get separated, even if you are married. It's actually good to realize your differences, decide that you work better apart, and provide support to an ex-spouse emotionally while you move on with your life as well.

[–] Zeritu@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (27 children)

I'm not sure that I fully agree. I mean, to each their own etc., but what you're describing seems to be more suited for relationships without marriage. The whole idea of being married is that your discuss this stuff before your wedding and then don't just get separated because you "don't feel it anymore". The idea is that, if you feel like you drifted apart, that your work on that and don't just get out of that relationship on a whim. That's the promise you give. And even if you agree with your partner to just go separate ways (yeah yeah, consenting adults can do whatever the fuck they want, sure), a divorce has the significant chance to screw you financially for decades. I mean, I don't know how it is in the US, but I've seen too many people who got their finances completely fucked by partners that they consentingly parted ways with, who they swore would treat them fairly. Too many houses repossessed, too many careers ruined.

Is it okay to get separated? Sure. It's obviously also okay to remain close and support each other, of course. But this comic promotes a lighthearted approach to something that deserves a much more careful and serious take that I don't agree with. Those first few panels should have made them get counselling, not divorced.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

that your work on that and don’t just get out of that relationship on a whim.

y tho?

You're making statements predicated on your beliefs that may not be shared by everyone.

[–] Zeritu@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

y tho?

You're making statements predicated on your beliefs that may not be shared by everyone.

This is not about my belief. You know a marriage is more than just a pinky promise? If you don't want to take a relationship seriously, that's fine, but marriage as a legal construct entails a lot of regulations that may screw up either partner and, with enough legal battles, both of them, so yeah, you kind of have to take it seriously and it doesn't make much sense to just enter and exit it on a whim, unless you want to be paying for other people's houses or cars.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 months ago

The idea is that, if you feel like you drifted apart, that your work on that and don’t just get out of that relationship on a whim.

This part is separate from the legal framework.

Is your argument "you shouldn't dissolve a marriage because the legal frameworks we built don't support that well"?

If so, is that how things should be?

Regardless, there are steps you can take to minimize legal challenges in divorce.

You are making the assumption that the divorce won't be amicable. The situation in the original text here is extremely amicable.

If the legal framework was adjusted to remove the risks of "paying for other people's cars", would you still advocate for taking it seriously? Why?

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)