Technology

59300 readers

4609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

432

Manifest V2 phase-out begins (blog.chromium.org)

submitted 5 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

no unified password management (or even worse: everything gets just attached to your google/ios account - i hate apps that do not give me the option to keep stuff separate)
no history functions (esp. over multiple devices)
single apps getting bought out by marketing corpos or bad actors without getting notified
data sniffing apps are harder to reign in than my sandboxed browser tabs.
NO ADBLOCKING AVAILABLE IN APPS

I'm sure there are a lot more reasons, that's just what came into my mind

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Apps being created seperatly doesn't mean they can't interact with each other, so I don't see those concerns as a problem. Is there anything fundamentally preventing the creation of new apps to do tasks currently exclusive to browsers?

Isn't the possibility of single apps getting bought out an argument against having all your eggs in one basket? 🙃

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i think i would get notified in some way if the Mozilla Foundation changes ownership, and since it's open source that is not much of an argument. open source is getting more common the last few years, but it's definitely not common

sure, it doesn't mean they can't. everyone making their own app also means that they don't per default.

and you didn't touch the point regarding NO ADBLOCKING IN APPS while the whole debate here is because alphabet doesn't want effective adblocking in their browser.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know what to say regarding your claim of no ad blocking in apps because I don't understand why you think that. I disagree because it's the same game just in different apps, depending on the medium:

images then you could do what ad blockers fo now: block based on domain -video you still disregard other ad files, or have a sysyem like sponser block
text (e.g.) on a Gemini client you'd need to detect the text that looks like ads.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

domain based blocking systems are nice for a base level of ad removal, they do nothing if the ads are coming from the same domain. sponsorblock is nice, but it's the work of volunteers to remove those ads - if youtubes userbase were splintered over thousands of apps it wouldn't be feasable.

i don't know when i have seen just text-based ads in the last 10 years. those are an non-issue, even for me. the issues are scripts, user profiling and tracking.

the big difference is: the browser gives webpages/apps a standardized environment where the user has the last word regarding what runs on it or not (if you are not using chromium anyway). in apps, the user doesn't have that luxury, especially regarding tracking and profiling.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I value software freedom so I don't promote proprietary apps that prevent users doing their computing the way they want. There's not much I can do about how companies mistreat their users. Just contribute to free (open source) software, advocate for a culture that values freedom over convenience, and advocate for laws against proprietary software.