this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
152 points (96.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5229 readers
529 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
152
Can Trump Really Slam the Brakes on Electric Vehicles? He has vowed to shred President Biden’s E.V. policies and has threatened that “You won’t be able to sell those cars.” (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

While a Trump presidency couldn’t slam the brakes on the E.V. transition, it could throw enough sand in the gears to slow it down. And that might have significant consequences for the fight to stop global warming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How much greenhouses gasses could be reduced if we just glued Trump's mouth shut?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, his mouth is his biggest asset. If he didn’t have that mouth, more conservatives and independents would vote for him.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you mean liability unless I’m just being a dummy

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I was being sarcastic when I said asset. My sarcasm let go half way through the post

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

Ha all good