this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
1350 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
6835 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 288 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Not surprising. They archive information that powerful people would rather we forget.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 139 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Not surprising. They archive information that powerful people would rather ~~we forget~~ monetise.

FTFY

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 77 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's both. I'm sure Puff Daddy, and R Kelly would rather we forget all the horrible things they've done rather than make money off of it. At the same time the NYTimes and the Atlantic would love to make money off their articles about those two people.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That literally has nothing to do with archive.org

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Archive.com is not archive.org.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I keep seeing people reference diddy did something bad, without mentioning what he did......

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Half a dozen people have accused him of sexual assault.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 4 points 10 months ago

He assaulted a singer named Cassie.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Addition to what others have stated. He is in trouble for more than just one woman. There are many claiming, but Cassie was the first (I think) that accused him and got paid to not say anything. That made his civil suit with her go away, but the feds built up a case and busted on human trafficking amongst other things. His old employee has a bunch of recordings of illegal stuff.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

i actually doubt that. i bet of they could make money off of it woth no repercussions they would not give a single fuck.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So we're accusing P.Diddy and R. Kelley of DDOSing the Internet Archive, then?

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Exactly. We're allowed to know based on what we can afford to know.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I doubt this has to do with "powerful people". A DDOS attack does not remove anything from the net, but only makes it temporarily hard to reach.

There are firms that specialize in suppressing information on the net. They use SEO tricks to get sites down-ranked, as well as (potentially fraudulent) copyright and GDPR request.

There must be any number of "little guys" who hate the Internet Archive. They scrape copyrighted stuff and personal data "without consent" and even disregard robots.txt. Lemmy is full of people who think that people should go to jail for that sort of thing.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Lots of grand conspiracy theories in this thread when, in the end, it's probably some bored script kiddy

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I doubt it. I'd sooner think it's a corporation or state actor.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How does taking the website down for a few hours help those people? Especially a state actor? If it was the US government or someone like them wouldn't they do something more permanent? Actually wipe the website?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some news source released something that got redacted based on government pressure. Archive made a snapshot of the news source. Now the state actor goes after the Archive to prevent time sensitive information from spreading. They benefit from the information not being widely available immediately.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh....so what got released today?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How would I know? The news source retracted their statement and archive.org is down...

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Up for me. It was down a few hours tops. And I remember checking it around the time you made that post as well?

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Israel attacking Palestine again possibly

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What does knocking the website offline for a few hours do for their war?

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

OwN tEh LiBs !!!

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Who knows, how in The world would I know

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

err....it was your suggestion?

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I offered a plausible explanation never did I suggest it was THE reason. Near zero chance we will ever know

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I just don't see how its plausible Israel wanted a website to go down for 2 hours to help them bomb Palestine

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf -2 points 10 months ago

Who knows, could be anyone for any reason

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Aliens or illuminati, for sure.

[–] nl4real@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is it still something you can do to big sites the way people did back in the 2000's?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yep but usually the worst case scenario is a few hours of downtime.

[–] stillitcomes@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh that's true. I've seen a lot of cancel/call-out documents archived on IA, some of which were directed at children or had false accusations on them. It would be funny but not that surprising if all of this was over obscure Twitter drama.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 2 points 10 months ago

That's one of the problems with archiving everything. I lean in favor of the IA, but there are still issues.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on the last part?

TBH I can understand that it's a problem for people who aren't expecting it. If they disregard instructions not to index things then that's also a problem. The only real way to prevent scrapers from replicating content is to place it behind a registration wall.