this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
143 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1224 readers
57 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] style99@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Interesting, to be sure:

Outside observers say that the numbers don’t add up behind Disney’s decision to take down the shows and claim a $1.5 billion impairment charge. That’s because Disney is claiming two contradictory things: both that the assets were producing so little value that it’s cheaper to destroy them than to keep them and that the assets were worth $1.5 billion.

“I cannot figure out how they can possibly get to $1.5 billion, because they should have almost no unamortized costs” under the 2017 tax bill, said David Offenberg, a professor of entertainment industry finance at Loyola Marymount University.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A big part is there's apparently nothing requiring them to disclose streaming numbers

So it's like how trump does his taxes. They just claim whatever benefits th in the moment. So as a "loss" it's worth a shitton, but as a "profit" it's worth nothing.

It's why actor/writer residuals are so shit, the billion dollar companies do t have to tell anyone how much it actually costs or makes.

[–] RocksForBrains@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Regulators and investors are behind the curve in regard to entertainment technology. Big business is taking advantage of everything not written into an ironclad contract.

Their big move upcoming is offloading as much as they can from D+ to Hulu, because if the contract only discusses streaming on D+ than there are no royalties to pay through Hulu.

load more comments (1 replies)