this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
767 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59370 readers
4570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
767
ChatGPT Answers Programming Questions Incorrectly 52% of the Time: Study (gizmodo.com)
submitted 5 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
186 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The research from Purdue University, first spotted by news outlet Futurism, was presented earlier this month at the Computer-Human Interaction Conference in Hawaii and looked at 517 programming questions on Stack Overflow that were then fed to ChatGPT.

“Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose,” the new study explained. “Nonetheless, our user study participants still preferred ChatGPT answers 35% of the time due to their comprehensiveness and well-articulated language style.”

Disturbingly, programmers in the study didn’t always catch the mistakes being produced by the AI chatbot.

“However, they also overlooked the misinformation in the ChatGPT answers 39% of the time,” according to the study. “This implies the need to counter misinformation in ChatGPT answers to programming questions and raise awareness of the risks associated with seemingly correct answers.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Counter arguments

  1. technology develops exponentially, while humans are … static
  2. even now single line of code LLM generates faster and cheaper
  3. the replacement is not programmer->LLM but programmer -> (programmer +LLM). LLM is just a tool.
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago

technology develops exponentially, while humans are … static

I have yet to see a self-improving technology that does not require adaptive human intelligence as an input.

[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

So refreshing when the voice of reason pops up in here. Thankyou!