this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
73 points (95.1% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2769 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so the plan is move tye entirity of china here then? All 1.4 billion people?

Thats not a reasonable goal. Even you moved in 10 percent of china, youd overwhelm every social service and everything else for that matter. And youd be leaving 90% of china to die while destroying the west's ability to function.

Migration is not a solution.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Now you're moving the goalposts. And you've moved them more than once already.

First you claimed that it would be sustainable for the over a billion people in India to stay where they were because it's possible to survive in tundras and deserts.

Then you said that moving them to a place where water exists wouldn't fix the problem of them dying due to a lack of a water.

Then you asked why water would exist in the new place, which was just a silly question for anyone who understands basic geography.

Now you're talking about moving all of China, when China wasn't even discussed.

And at each step, you haven't gone back to the previous one and acknowledged it was a silly thing to say.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I never said India, this is the first comment india was uttered. Youre the one that brought up glaciers. And China is largely watered by glaciers, its the logical next part in the discussion. And even it was India, they also have over a billion people and you face the same problem with simply too many people.

Immigration is not a solution.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

So you're not going to acknowledge anything else you said. I guess there's no point in this conversation continuing.