this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Jellyfin: The Free Software Media System

5721 readers
14 users here now

Current stable release: 10.10.0

Community Standards

Website

Forum

GitHub

Documentation

Feature Requests

Matrix (General Information & Help)

Matrix (Announcements)

Matrix (General Development)

Matrix (Off-Topic) - Come get to know the team and blow off steam!

Matrix Space - List of all the available rooms on Matrix.

Discord - Bridged to our Matrix rooms

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hello,

I'm interested in setting up a jellyfin server that will only serve streams to TVs on my LAN. Files will be on an existing NAS. Usage will be low (probably just one stream at a time); cheap and reliable is the name of the game, and cheap includes power consumption. I am thinking of some kind of NUC but don't know enough about jellyfin yet to decide on specs. Any recommendations for a specific NUC model or CPU/GPU? I assume I will be running linux - any distro recommendations?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vittelius@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

You could certainly do worse for a nas than a thin client with hard drives. But you probably want to go for something where you can add you hard drives via SATA rather than usb. That being said I haven't run into any issues with consumer grade usb-harddives (but I'm also cognicent of the fact, that I'm not using than the way there are intended).

As a OS for a thin client solution or a NAS build from scratch may I recommend OpenMediaVault? It's basically just Debian but with a nice web UI on top to help you manage your system. You still have full command line access but the web UI helps you to configure your drives and create network shares.

If you install the community add-ons (OMV-Extras) you also gain the gain the possibility to install and manage docker containers graphically

The only thing to keep in mind is that omv requires a bigger harddrive than the NVME drive that comes with most thin client. So there is a good chance that you need to change that (which will set you back an additional 20 or so bucks)