this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
407 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2572 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Iranian police have arrested more than 260 people, including three European citizens, on suspicion of spreading satanism, the state-run IRNA news agency reported Friday.

The report said the suspects were arrested on Thursday night in Shahryar County, west of the capital of Tehran, for “spreading the culture of satanism and nudity.” It did not elaborate.

It was not clear how such a large number of arrests were made in one night — if the suspects were in one location, at some gathering or party, or not.

Gatherings where unrelated men and women are seen together are illegal in Iran and considered a sin under Islamic law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah if only they had their own secular, democratically elected leaders. And maybe those leaders could even decide to nationalize their oil.

What could possibly go wrong for them?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's... That's my point. My comment is lamenting the fact that Iran had that, and then the West fucked it up.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did I just whoosh myself? Well played. Now I’ll have to take some time to reflect on this.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Unfortunately I'm afraid you did. And unfortunately I'm obligated to say "Congratulations, you played yourself."

EDIT: I do appreciate you saying that though!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Nassar's Egypt, Mosaddegh's Iran, Sankara's Burkino Faso, Obote's Uganda, Lumumba's Congo, Trujillo's Dominican Republic, Sukarno's Indonesia (Read the Jakarta Method folks), Goulart's Brazil, Arbenz's Guatamala, Guardia's Costa Rica, Allende's Chile...

I don't know what it is, but democratically elected leaders in countries that pursued an unaligned status just have a habit of getting couped by reactionary members of their militaries for some crazy reason.