this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
516 points (97.3% liked)

Not The Onion

12254 readers
989 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Jesus: I came not to enforce the law, but to fulfill it.

Paul: Well, what he AKSTUALLY meant is blah blah ceremonial law vs moral law blah blah sex is yucky, I mean sinful!

I mean, it's more complex than that, but Paul wrote like he understood the necessity of reproduction, but didn't really comprehend what sexual urges actually feel like. He also wrote such long rambling sentences that he makes Charles Dickens look concise and clear.

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a cult based on fear and confusion

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Matthew was just trying to repair the damage to James, very likely.

Paul: OT is gone except the parts I like

James: OT is still there even oral parts drifting around it.

A huge difference in how the religion should be practiced.

Now if you were a writer 5 decades later and needed to redeem the image of James, while still showing that he was wrong, this could be a good way to do it. It wasn't that James was super wrong, he just misunderstood something Jesus said at one point. Could happen to anyone.