this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
599 points (77.1% liked)

Political Memes

5455 readers
1575 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think that's been a proven case for European parliamentary democracies giving way to right wing and fascist parties. But that's more the reverse: the liberal and center-left move center and then lose.

But US politics doesn't have much leftist policy to shed, or many leftist politicians to exoricate, so it is more that even when Democrats win, policy stays right of center. Which is where the frustrated remark "both parties are the same" comes from, which everyone also shits on.

Since you know, the centre right continually stretches further right like a rubber band.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Dems can't move as far left as you want them to when there's a very real chance of losing. Want it to move left? Give Dems overwhelming and consistent wins and they can listen to the more left part of their party and move left.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If this were a parliamentary system, sure. But our constitutional framework does not produce overwhelming, consistent victory. Like, ever, in its history.

May I remind you after the Bush administration, Obama won both the primaries and the overall election by campaigning from the left, not the center. And he won by a very wide margin.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hmmmmm how ever could you influence who would win an election? Hmmmmmmm, Let's see. Oh yeah, by voting.

May I remind you that Obama was not running against an incumbent? (Not to mention that he mostly ran on hope. And after the war mongering Bush it really didn't take much.) When running against an incumbent, you have to go to the centre. That was how Clinton and Biden won. And we're back to how do you move things left? Simple: By voting. By giving consistent and overwhelming victories.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Biden isn't running against an incumbent, he is the incumbent. You want him to run from the center against an incumbent, OK. But then what? Run from the center again? That doesn't make sense.

Again, "consistent, overwhelming" victory is a fantasy. Control of the executive and legislative branch exchanges hands every few terms. That's just how this rule-set and this electorate play out.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

JFC Now you're just playing dumb. Biden ran against the incumbent, do I have to specify I'm talking 2020? When Biden faced off against the incumbent in 2020 he had to run centre. JFC. And guess fucking what, that carries on. Especially when it's a rematch of the same guys, with the same policies, the same MO. Why do I bother when you play dumb. (Not that he's even announced what he's running on yet for 2024, but we can take a good guess).

Yeah you're back to excusing yourself for not voting. Jeez you know how you could change that changing hands stuff? By voting. Seriously why am I bothering when all you do is make excuses for not voting. If you want to continue you're gong to have to do better.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Presidentially: yeah.

Congressionally and locally: not nearly as much. There's a pretty solid track record especially since the Citizens United and SpeechNow decisions of the Democratic Party either mobilizing against progressives and for conservatives in primaries where there isn't even a GOP threat.

They even took down Katie Porter because she didn't kiss the ring of Dianne Feinstein.

But yeah, the acute threat the GOP poses gives them harm reduction status.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

President and Congress. Probably locally too but federally is what I'm focusing on.

And this isn't strictly harm reduction. Like I said, want it to move left? That will happen with overwhelming and consistent wins.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Dems can’t move as far left as you want them to when there’s a very real chance of losing.

At least, not when there's a very real chance of losing to the right.

It'd be different if the Republican Party was out there hawking Marx instead of Mises.