this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
812 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10950 readers
1928 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're personifying the paper by assuming that it can feel an emotion

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i wouldn't have done it if the paper didn't say it was itself.

Arguably the paper here is personifying itself, our interpretation of it is dependent on whether or not we want to believe the paper or not. I'm not the one ascribing the emotion of sadness to the paper, it's the paper ascribing it to itself. I'm merely interpreting what the paper says to be the probable truth here.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And why do you interpret what the paper says (that it can feel sadness) as true ?

because that's what the paper said, and i'm allowed to think whatever i want to think. Maybe i think the papers true because for the purposes of this thread, it makes my shitpost funny, maybe i think it's true because i think the concept of sentience is bullshit.

Maybe i'm just lying and i don't actually think it's true, but i'm just saying it is for the statement.