Funny

6894 readers

363 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

851

That's not troubling at all (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for the info. Still seems needlessly specific to distinguish it from AI, when AI is already being watered down...

[–] techMayhem@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

It is not distinguished from AI, just a subcategory of it

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

AI isn't being watered down, quite the opposite.

Path finding, computer vision, optical character recognition, machine learning and large language models were all unambiguously considered to be vAI technology before they were widespread, and now the media and general public tend to avoid the term for all but the most recent developments.

It's called The AI Effect