Arch Linux

7763 readers

8 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

Choosing Next OS (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by bitahcold@lemmy.world to c/archlinux@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was Nobara user, then I am using Fedora right now. I want to use things like Hyprland etc. and ya know, Its damn cool to say I am using arch btw. So I've decided to use Arch Linux. But everyone says its always breaking and gives problems. That's because of users, not OS.. right? I love to deal with problems but I don't want to waste my time. Is Arch really problemful OS? Should I use it? I know what to do with setup/ usage, the hardness of Arch is not problem for me but I am just concerned about the mindset "Arch always gets broken".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

sample size of 1, admittedly, but there's so few times I've managed to break arch - which I can't 100% attribute to myself.

Once the updates broke, somehow wiping bash -binary and kernel. Not entirely sure how or why, all I did was a normal pacman -Suy. I might have issued the pacman -command from a long path which didn't exist anymore, not sure if relevant or not. Hasn't happened since, so... dunno. It did spook me a bit, but nobody else at the time reported similar issues.

I've ran arch for years at work (webdevelopment, desktop and laptop), home server (irc shell, mumble, etc hosting) and now home desktop too (gaming, media, dualbooting with win10).

The home server has required a powerbutton -forced boot once or twice, many months of uptime & regular kernel updates can apparently mess something with networking and usb, so can't ssh in and keyboard doesn't get regognized when plugged in. So, you know, reboot after kernel updates? :D

It's always a good idea to check the website for breaking changes which require manually doing something, there has been a few along the years.