this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
792 points (91.9% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
3075 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

'Cost effectives' when not counting all the costs of monoculturing all the things. Or transport.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Most "cost effective" things are only that if you don't count Negative Externalities.

The obvious example is fossil fuels.

Yeah sure, if everybody else is enduring and/or paying for the bad side effects of the way somebody conducts an economic activity, it's "cost effective" for those doing that activity that way.

[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 7 points 5 months ago

Subsidized cost effectiveness.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -3 points 5 months ago

I think the hypothetical here implies transport would still exist for a primarily home-garden non-industrial agriculture replacement system. Or do you think the whole world should suddenly stop trading? Might as well since we're writing a fantasy fiction, anything goes.