this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
1018 points (98.1% liked)

Open Source

31291 readers
402 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Floorp is not open source, it's proprietary.

You may not modify, adapt, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Thanks for sharing!

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't seem compatible with the MPL. Or is it just their modifications that aren't in the original source files that are licensed this way?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

2.5. Floorp is not completely open-source same. Floorp's a part of codes are protected by copyright law and is not licensed under an open-source license. You may not use part of Floorp's code in your own projects without permission from the Licensor.

2.6. If MPL2.0 or any other open-source license notation is present in the file, the file is available as open source.

It seems like their modifications and the resulting application are proprietary.

The MPL is an open-source license designed to protect its own code. If you modify MPL code, you need to publish those modifications under the MPL. That's the focus of the license. There's no "viral" requirement to affect the licensing provisions of the rest of your code.

It seems this is a legal way of using MPL code.