this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
-14 points (33.3% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14243 readers
3 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sabbah@lemmy.world
AradFort@lemmy.world
rikudou@lemmings.world
Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
Rikudou_Sage@lemmy.world
-14
If the IBM PC used an ARM (or related) CPU instead of the Intel 8088, would smartphones ultimately have sucked less? (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by url8@lemmy.world to c/explainlikeimfive@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Developers still continue to shaft anyone that isn't using an IBM PC compatible. But if the IBM PC was more closely related to the latest Nexus/Pixel device, then would the gaming experience on smartphones be any good?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Smartphone CPUs are designed to be small and cool.

PC CPUs are designed to be powerful. Power means bigger and hotter.

The two are at competing odds.

If you want a better gaming experience but a smaller form factor, you need something like a SteamDeck. Or a laptop.

It's not that developers don't know how to make mobile games. It's that the games we want to play tend to need a lot of power, and mobile CPUs (and devices) can have trouble providing that.

If you want to play old games (from when desktop CPUs were less powerful than modern phones' CPUs now), then you'll want to look into emulators.