this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
1122 points (96.2% liked)

memes

9681 readers
3173 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 119 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They have an agenda, so they assume everyone else does too. It's always projection.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Universal happiness and prosperity could be a part of an agenda as well right?

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 16 points 4 months ago

Not an agenda people talk enough about

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

no, because there is no such thing as universal happiness.

everyone's happiness is different, and often conflicting.

for example, my father's happiness would have been me playing football. I hated sports. hence, he hated me until he died for 'hurting him'.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That really sucks. Can practically feel the tension through your post. What a bummer… shouldn’t kill anybody to let somebody else be happy doing their own thang (and be happy not necessarily copying another person’s thang).

Less importantly:

When I think about 'universal happiness', I’d think it’s more about creating conditions where everyone has the opportunity to pursue their own version of happiness, rather than imposing a single idea of happiness on everyone.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yeah, but that's not how people work.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

He'd be much happier in the grand scheme of things if he accepted his kids as they are.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is a strange exclusionary way of considering happiness, tbh.

Like even if I want, and maybe even would be most happy, to sit down in front of a plate of duck a l'orange for dinner doesn't mean I can't or won't be perfectly happy eating a sirloin steak for dinner instead

Edit: for clarity, I am referring to your father's view on happiness, not your response to it