this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1735 points (97.5% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

4003 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree that the civil war was about slavery and that it's ignorant to deny it, but "I have a degree and you surely don't, by the authority vested in me I declare you an idiot" is a terrible format for an argument, almost any other way of putting it would be better.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can say from experience that having expertise in an area where people deny reality because of politics can be absolutely exhausting. You can spend your whole life trying to counter the bullshit with fact and get nowhere. Arguing in good faith with someone who argues in bad faith is a losing game. Sometimes you just want to say "Shut up, I know more than you".

[–] NotThatKindofDoctor@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ugh I totally feel it. I have a PhD in sociology... sociology. If another person tells me that my research is just my opinion or that they have a one off anecdotal story that disproves any research I talk about, I might throw up on them. It's very difficult to be civil. But I try my best to educate and remain calm.

[–] bpudding@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

The anti-intellectualism that's infested this country for generations makes it so you almost have more credibilty if you're uninformed.

It is like doctors having to face people who's medical expertise is youtube videos and snake oil ads

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Sometimes you just want to say “Shut up, I know more than you”.

That is fair, I just think it won't do any good, and people who say more than that are doing good, even if they don't get to see it. Not saying the right move is to get sucked into a point by point debate with someone trying to spread lies, but anyone reading could benefit from being pointed in the direction of reality even if they won't thank you for it.

[–] dragoness@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So the fact that this person clearly has researched said subject enough to get a degree in it to know what they're talking about vs some dude who is quite possibly pulling bullshit out his ass doesn't allow for said learned person to tell said non-learned person they are an idiot?

Because sometimes I think it kinda does.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure they have a problem with using that expertise to call them an idiot instead of offering counterpoints.

A lot of the people on Lemmy seem to think the Internet isn't a casual space and think engaging with these types of people in those spaces will somehow change their opinions.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It doesn't give anyone new information, it's hostile in a way that could turn anyone on the fence against them and make everyone disagreeing dig their feet in more, and claiming expertise on the internet doesn't mean much because people lie constantly. You can demonstrate through writing that you know what you're talking about without asking people to take your word for it, you can make references. If you don't have time for an effortpost you can summarize, link, or quote an argument someone else made while putting it in context.

There are really excellent arguments against all kinds of misconceptions, it is a shame if what ends up spread around are schoolyard level clapbacks instead of those. r/AskHistorians in particular has some really good ones, including about this specific issue.

As a rule of thumb I think anytime you are invoking your expertise, you should also be sharing some of it.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That particular argument isn't debatable to anyone with any knowledge of history. It isn't everyone else's job to educate someone on easily researched topics. The answer is sometimes, no, fuck you, you're an asshole and a liar.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed. It’s not !clevercomebacks material.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's please not pretend somebody who knows something about a subject needs to say any more than Bullshit to deliberate liars.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it is basically never helpful to make that sort of argument. Did not imply there's an obligation to say something else.