this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
194 points (95.8% liked)

World News

39045 readers
2511 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

U.N. agencies said on Tuesday the two main crossings into the southern Gaza Strip remained shut, virtually cutting off the Palestinian enclave from outside aid with few stocks positioned inside.

The global agency's humanitarian office spokesperson Jens Laerke told journalists Israel had shut both the Rafah and Kerem Shalom crossings for aid and people as part of its military operation in Rafah, where around 1 million uprooted people are sheltering.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WamGams@lemmy.ca -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How many refugees can Egypt or Jordan realistically take? Are they at least willing to take the children?

These two nations right now are likely most capable of saving as many lives as possible, given their proximity. Is something like this even on the table?

[–] febra@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why doesn't Israel take the refugees? They claim that they're targeting only hamas after all and that they care a lot about innocents, so it shouldn't be a problem, right?

Besides that, if Palestinians leave their homes then Israel will just do more illegal land grabs and settlements.

[–] WamGams@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

I don't think any of us would accept Israel taking the children. Obviously nobody wants a refugee crisis, but Israel would be the cause of that refugee crisis, not the solution.

[–] tortillaPeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Totally off the table.

Firstly Egypt and Jordan don't want to give Israel more justification to annex Gaza through the displacement of Palestinians.

Secondly, security “Cairo does not want to have a new security problem on its hands in this problematic region,” Fabiani said. Jordan has similar concerns considering they had a king assassinated by a Palestinian in Jerusalem

[–] WamGams@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Clearly we don't want more annexations, I just wish somebody in the region was capable of preserving the life of children here.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

You are pointing out why the refugee crisis still exists after decades. No neighboring countries will accept the Palestinians, and many don't want to leave.

Israel is clearly creating the problem, but other regional actors are using the Palestinians as pawns because they don't like Israel (and don't actually care about Palestinians dying). Larger countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran have the land and the money to give them a better life.

Iran especially doesn't care about the Palestinians. They're a different religion, as you can see in this picture: