this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
839 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

10970 readers
1987 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Wait, I thought everything in math is rigorously and unambiguously defined?

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a hole at the bottom of math.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There’s a frog on the log on the hole on the bottom of math. There’s a frog on the log on the hole on the bottom of math. A frog. A frog. There’s a frog on the log on the hole on the bottom of math.

[–] RandomWalker@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Rigorously, yes. Unambiguously, no. Plenty of words (like continuity) can mean different things in different contexts. The important thing isn’t the word, it’s that the word has a clear definition within the context of a proof. Obviously you want to be able to communicate ideas clearly and so a convention of symbols and terms have been established over time, but conventions can change over time too.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Platonism Vs Intuitionism would like a word.