Technology

34891 readers

626 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

Intel continues search for source of Core i9 chip crashes — issues statement about recommended BIOS settings to board partners (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 6 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.ml

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Shit, that's not great. As a consumer, is their any way to protect yourself if you're in the market for a modern i9? Does the entire 12th gen lineup have issues?

I'm still using a 1st gen i7, and the lack of AVX is starting to become problematic, so I think it's time...

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I personally try to support the underdog, so AMD when it comes to x86.

Intel also refuses to provide Vulkan drivers for older CPU's iGPU's to drive consumers towards buying new systems, which I considered a dick move, and upgraded that laptop with an AMD based replacement.

We bought three 13900's for workstations at work, got burnt with two of them, bought 7950X3D's instead for the next three.

So, if you're set on Intel (which is your prerogative) ask someone else ;-)

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think my main reason when I looked into things a while back was that Intel had the better single core speeds, but I'm not married to the idea. I'll mostly be gaming and dabbling with local LLMs.

But yeah, I also haven't been a huge fan of Intel's anti-consumer business practices. Maybe it's time for an AMD system! Thanks!

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In the last few years, IMHO, single core performance has been irrelevant (for me personally and professionally).

Almost everything can be parallelized, it's just a bit harder to implement.

I've found disk I/O to be the biggest bottleneck recently, PCIe 5.0 NVMe has done more for speed than an extra few MHz have in years.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Thanks for the advice! I've been out of the game a long time, so the quick refresher was super helpful.