this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
866 points (99.1% liked)

Steam

10244 readers
2 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The censored one is probably Niger

UPDATE - special thanks to @dditty@lemm.ee for making a map showing the countries without access to PSN:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Wasn't Valve the one who pointed out that Russia was always pirating games not because they were inherently pirates but because the game releases had zero support for Russia lol. Hence why Valve was the first foreign developer/publisher that gained an actual foothold in the Russian market.

This is kind of like the same thing. Sony will just say something dumb like "we don't allow PSN accounts in these countries because they're full of pirates".

[–] snowadv@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The second problem is absence of regional prices in other markets but Steam.

They are selling games two (!!) or so times cheaper in RU region. For example, AAA game might cost 60 dollars or 6000 rub in US but it will costs 35 or 3500 rub in russian steam.

Even though I couldn't afford games in the past and pirated them - at some point I started buying stuff just because it gives much better, hustle -free experience.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If I’m low on cash, I pirate. When I have cash, I buy up the games I want. If it’s a game I enjoyed years ago and it’s on sale, I grab it.

The idea that piracy results in lost sales is flawed. No one I know who pirates can purchase the game to begin with.

Is a library piracy? No? Cool, discussion over.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I mean... Saying that it doesn't result in lost sales at all is disingenuous.

They aren't losing 70 dollars for every download, but they also aren't losing zero.

[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I often took the same approach back when buying a game was a financial consideration. But even though now 4/5 times I already know hat I'm buying and just pay, there are still the 1/5 times I'll pirate first as I'm really on the fence. Due to this I have a few games I ended up completing on pirate, but bought the game (and DLC if relevant) with 0 hours in my library because good work deserves recognition.

Otherwise we risk losing those good developers to other careers or into the AAA meat grinder.

For clarity I'm talking Indy titties here, I doubt I average much above 0.5/year AAA purchases anymore

Edit: actually I'll go one step further. If I pirate your game and hate it, then its delete and forget. If I buy your game and hate it that's a potential negative review, maybe even though me and that title we just a bad fit. This is why demos need to become ubiquitous again

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 months ago

100% true. India is (or was?) also big for games just not being sold there.

Game companies shooting themselves in the foot? Never heard of it.

[–] GTG3000@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago

That rings true for me. Only stopped pirating once steam was an option, myself.

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

They're about to be full of pirates.