this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
504 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39104 readers
2399 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

m pointing at all of our piles and saying “look, you can actually make an effort to decrease yours

This has no impact on a problem at the scale of industry.

If we were talking about picking up litter at the park, sure. But when we're discussing the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, there is no solution that isn't systematic.

You’re arguing that your pile does not count

It functionally does not. I can't pollute at the scale necessary for anyone to notice, individually.

And zeroing my pollution out does nothing to mitigate the problem.

Even at the scale of city blocks - hundreds of people - there's no impact.

The only solution is systematic.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You're making my argument for me.

You're effectively arguing that there is no point in picking up your litter at the park because there is a pacific garbage patch...and man the garbage can is all the way on the other side! It's like a full time job to throw away my litter! Me throwing away my litter is so tiny in the grand scheme of things, so it's not my fault if I just toss it on the ground.

We both agree major changes need to happen. But every time you leave your litter out, you're contributing to the problem as well and shoulder some responsibility. It's not like throwing out your litter precludes you from pushing for systemic changes. It's just something you can do, right now, to minimize your contribution to it.

And buying from places like I suggest is even more useful because it helps them thrive and spread. While I don't see how throwing away your litter really helps it spread.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You’re effectively arguing that there is no point in picking up your litter at the park

I said the exact opposite

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No you're main argument is effectively arguing that. Or I should say it's the equivalent argument.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That strawman is taking one hell of a beating.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not a strawman, it's an analogy; I'm not saying this is the argument you are making, but the equivalent of the argument you are making.

Although, I have to laugh at the fact that you claimed I said the exact opposite of what I literally and explicitly stated, and now are all up in arms over an analogy as a "strawman." lol

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m not saying this is the argument you are making, but the equivalent of the argument you are making.

When you reverse an argument and claim it is equivalent, you are either extremely illogical or dishonest.

I have to laugh

Perhaps you're experiencing some kind of mania.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

When you reverse an argument and claim it is equivalent, you are either extremely illogical or dishonest.

Okay, I get it. You realize your position is no longer defensible and lying is all you've got now.

Take care.