Privacy

31892 readers

641 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

180

ESRB plans “facial age estimation” checker for age verification (www.dexerto.com)

submitted 1 year ago by redimk@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The ESRB has added:

“To be perfectly clear: Any images and data used for this process are never stored, used for AI training, used for marketing, or shared with anyone; the only piece of information that is communicated to the company requesting VPC is a “Yes” or “No” determination as to whether the person is over the age of 25.”

Sure, ok...

I don't know what else to say about this, this will obviously turn into something else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Doug@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except all the times it has.

When there's only one camera that's often been the way it has worked

[–] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe 5 years ago, but not (usually) any more

[–] Doug@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it does, in at least some cases, work like that?

It's ok to admit being wrong

[–] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, it does work like that in some cases. My comment is technically wrong, the best kind of wrong.

As another commenter pointed out, the way they intend to do it sounds absolutely like they are going to do it the old way, which surprises me because the hold up a photo thing has been a solved problem for a while.