this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
129 points (83.1% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2258 readers
83 users here now

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's the argument. On one side it's "Here's a heap of statistics, and testimonials from Vets about how this breed was bred for fighting and is extremely dangerous to humans" and on the other side:

"Says the guy who probably tortures animals".

So, of course it's nasty. People who have actually been attacked by pitbulls, mauled and disabled by them, are fighting fucking morons. Really, really stupid people that care more about dogs than humans.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

While I agree that pits have the capability to fuck your shit up 6 ways before you can blink, and along with breeds like the Pug should just be allowed to die off with the current generation, you are using a common tactic of "I'll use the best argument to represent my side, and the worst argument to represent their side so it's clear my side is superior" as a generalization for the entire opposing viewpoint.

Straw men blow away in strong winds. Build better arguments, you'll make better points.

[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is it a strawman if someone came and specifically argued that?

It's a strawman if it's presented as "the argument of that side", yes.