this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1003 points (96.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5742 readers
2307 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Although, just a little asterisk and footnote moment, it is technically possible to gain some level of wealth, like really really upper middle class, through means that are not directly predatory. Incredibly unlikely, but possible.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue that even very wealthy people who actually do something, like pro athletes, are getting paid correctly. If you're one of the best in the world at what you do, then you should get paid a lot. It's just that the exploiter class is still taking the lions share of the value they create... And "entertainment value" is dubious at best imo. But the exploiter class pays well for people to keep us distracted... I guess: don't hate the players, hate the game-owners

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Money is the Talisman of illusion that tricks the actual giving all real value for it"s essence of being the opposite...

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not sure what you mean, could you explain please?

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Incredibly unlikely, but possible.

I don't think it's incredibly unlikely working in IT in the USA.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are some professions that are very well compensated because they're still so hard to hire and retain for, but I'd argue they're still undervalued on the whole for what they return for investors.

Also all of us in the global North are supported by a chain of exploitation of labour and nature that wraps around the entire globe, which isn't our individual fault, but is part of the reason for our relative prosperity.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also all of us in the global North are supported by a chain of exploitation of labour and nature that wraps around the entire globe, which isn’t our individual fault, but is part of the reason for our relative prosperity.

Good point

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago

Thanks I'm pretty proud of that sentence

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 months ago

You used to be correct. Now, the IT have been traded for dice of errors. There is no correct result for anyone, though a few of the result will appear to be correct long enough to sucker the viral tricking the trade of humans for AI.