this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
1018 points (90.7% liked)

memes

9741 readers
1900 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eerongal@ttrpg.network 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thats only because of how the standard deduction works; If you have to itemize, then any amount of charitable donations can be deducted (up to like 60% of your AGI i think). Basically anyone needs to "outweigh" the standard deduction with their own deductions, because doing otherwise is worse. Technically i think you could forgo the standard deduction and use your own, even if you don't go over the standard deduction, but why would you?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That's the point: almost nobody benefits from charitable donations because almost everybody takes the standard deduction, so "but you can get tax benefits for donating!" is a red herring in almost all cases.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That catch on current code is that they combined exemption with standard deduction. Makes it quite a bit more difficult than the before times.

I'll leave it at that as I'm generally overwhelmed with unparalleled Internet tax expertise any time the subject arises.