this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
163 points (95.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8660 readers
692 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I’m happy for people who like these games, but I am so tired of seeing articles about them in my feeds. They are still companies, they still don’t care about you, just your money, but everyone acts like these two are their best friends and the saviors of gaming.

[–] MisterFeeny@kbin.social 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, they like money. Who doesn't? But you have to admit there's a big difference between what Larian gave us for $60 with Baldur's Gate, and shit like $65 mounts in Diablo and $80 melee weapons in CoD and the various other chicanery ActiBlizz and other truly greedy companies have been pulling.

As such, in addition to liking money, I would argue the people at Larian genuinely care about making a good game that people enjoy. Cuz if it was ONLY about the money, they would've made a much different game. I imagine it helps not being a publicly traded company.

I think it’s actually simpler than that. It’s a thing that used to be a lot more common decades ago. They have talented people, those people made a good product, and as a result the product effectively sold itself.

Just goes to show that there’s a road to commercial success that doesn’t involve treating your users and customers as a resource to exploit, and it’s causing all the other gaming company CEOs to lose their fucking minds because this is starting to turn into an industry-wide grassroots rebellion.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I like how this article specifically mentions two popular games at the moment. That's SEO for ya. This article could easily be told without mentioning either of these games, but if they did that, then they wouldn't get traffic from people who like those games. They'd have to actually write something worth reading.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The article would be a lot less convincing if it didn't present the clear evidence provided by those games. They are important in this context because there aren't a lot of games like them coming out today.