this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Anarchism
1394 readers
15 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, thanks for telling me something I've known for years. I only care about tone when talking to actual human beings in person. When I want to learn something, I want it in plain text.
So does tone not enhance your learning experience in any way? Because for me some concepts are a lot easier to grasp when I have someone explain them to me. Also listening is a lot less effort and can be done passively while for me reading requires a lot more of a conscious effort.
No. Tone is generally irrelevant, especially when I'm reading technical documentation. Having a manual page for a UNIX system function read to me isn't helpful. If it's read by a man, it'll bore me. If it's read by a woman, and she sounds attractive, I'll be thinking about disappointing her in bed instead of keeping my mind on the job.
You might find that a point in favor of listening, but I find that conscious effort that reading entails improves retention. There's are reasons we have idioms like "in one ear, out the other", and I'm one of them. Besides, and as I mentioned before, audio and video are shit for reference. You can't grep audio and video and search by keywords. Audio and video generally don't come with indexes where keywords are connected to timestamps for easy access to relevant sections.
Yeah I understand and actually agree with the points you've raised. I just like using different mediums for different experiences and wanted to balance the conversation.