this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
146 points (94.5% liked)

Linux

48157 readers
711 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

On the one hand they should be paid for there work. On the other hand that's not the right way to get paid for work.

They should ask for donations and sell cool merch

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

that’s not that right way to get paid

I don't know a whole lot about what Audacity is up to these days, but the same company owns MuseScore, and it sounds like they're doing kinda similar things in terms of monetisation. The core software itself is still free, but there are optional cloud services on top of that which you can pay for.

I don't see what's wrong with this. Cloud services provide a convenience. Some people like that convenience and are willing to pay for it. Others might be perfectly ok doing it themselves and won't pay.

It helps that the new head of design for both of these products is a guy who really knows his shit. He's already taken MuseScore from an application that nobody in their right mind would use if they could afford the commercial competitors, to a legitimately great music engraving application, and he's been on Audacity too since 2021.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The problem lies in the fact that these services are completely proprietary and are an example of service as a software substitute.

Foss should encourage privacy and freedom. Cloud storage doesn't normally do that. What's worse it it often requires non free libraries to be included which is a no no

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Foss should encourage privacy and freedom. Cloud storage doesn’t normally do that.

Then don't use it? It's that simple. If it makes money for them and some users like it, there's nothing wrong with that.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 6 points 6 months ago

It's free software so you can get rid of it if you want. It's not really for the users of a free software project to dictate the direction the project should take, perhaps unless they have made substantial contributions

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It helps that the new head of design for both of these products is a guy who really knows his shit. He's already taken MuseScore from an application that nobody in their right mind would use if they could afford the commercial competitors, to a legitimately great music engraving application, and he's been on Audacity too since 2021.

I tried Audacity before that and couldn't migrate from adobe's aquired CoolEditPro (Au versions before modern redesign). Have it changed much since then? I'm yet to find an alternative (video editing tools just doesn't make it, although they get recommended) and as I can recall Audacity had an interface that's not as easy to use.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I couldn't tell you for sure, because I don't use it or its commercial competition very much. That said, personally when I have needed to use it, I've always found the gap between Audacity and its pro equivalents in terms of basic usability to be much lower than in other creative fields. GIMP, in particular, is nigh unusable compared to Photoshop.

If you're interested in seeing more, here's a video where the new lead announced that he was taking it over. And the official Audacity YouTube channel has been posting overviews of its updates since then. I think it likely that the first two updates (3.1 and 3.2) contain some of the most critical functionality.

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 6 months ago

Audacity doesn't come anywhere close to professional DAWs like Audition and it's not really trying to be one afaik. Ardour is the way to go for professional needs.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

here's a video where the new lead announced that he was taking it over

the official Audacity YouTube channel

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.