this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
370 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

60105 readers
1847 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 99 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Crazy that the proposed solution to propaganda is banning media instead of investing in education that promotes critical thinking. Or maybe the idea here is "no propaganda except mine".

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Investing in education is counter to the clear goals of the USA. Smart people would revolt, protest,and you know, hold companies and billionaires accountable. Uneducated people are often poor, can’t afford to fight back and are scared they will lose what little they have.

At some point we need all to fight back, but it might be too late. And worse, too few will join in out of fear of death.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

If people can pick apart China's propaganda it means they can pick apart US propaganda, too.

Can't have that.

[–] SolNine@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have to tell you, I know many intelligent people that have succumbed to propaganda, and outrage porn addiction. I see it continue to happen on all sides of the political isle. (This isn't a both sides kind of statement, simply acknowledgement that the same tactics work on our brain, indifferent of political ideology.)

Whether they are hooked on the dopamine rush of rage baiting up votes, likes or comments; or only seeing everything in the world through a myopic lens of negativity, it has captured many of my friends and family, including myself for a time.

For some their drug is Fox News, others it's Reddit, Facebook or TikTok, the results are often the same.

I have yet to figure out a manner in which to communicate with individuals who spend considerable amounts of time in echo chambers, constantly having their personal beliefs reinforced. Evasion of cognitive dissonance and social conflict are very powerful psychological motivations. I wish I knew the solution.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Fuck that bro, get mad as hell.

We deserve better lives, and we should be pissed it's being taken from us.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Not really sure what you're getting at. Getting mad is good, getting locked into an echo chamber and eschewing critical thinking in lieu of groupthink is bad.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

get mad as hell

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, of course. They aren't banning Facebook, Instagram or YouTube. That's exactly how they want it.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

they aren't even banning tiktok, at least they're trying not to. What they're trying to do is force a sale specifically to US government insiders. They're seizing it. They want that sweet, sweet propaganda and data mining for themselves.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 2 points 8 months ago

Wow good find. The revolving door in action.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

What do you think billionaires are bribing congress for? Regulatory capture keeps all the competitors out. Whereas actually fixing the problem of social media brainwashing would cost them money.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

And yet China is banning basically the whole Western internet, foreign companies must enter joint ventures with Chinese companies under government control. Reciprocity is fair. Why should Byte Dance be allowed to take in billions to fund Chinese gulags?

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

China does thing: Bad

America does same thing: Good

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago

At least the US government can't harvest US citizens social media data without a warrant (excepting all the patriot act stuff). But there is zero protection for your data from the CCP if it's on TikTok. That's understandably a pretty huge security concern. I can also understand China not wanting data from their citizens in the hands of American social media companies. Idk if any if it is good or bad but it's certainly common sense on a national level.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As someone who's neither chinese nor american I want nothing more than these countries to keep their hands to themselves. I don't like China doing it, and I don't want the US doing it because China does it. Are y'all gonna hand a piece of your companies to every country they operate in? I'm guessing "no".

[–] OftenWrong@startrek.website 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Why do you want our social media to mirror China? That's the real question. What's the US gonna do with our data that's so much better? Oh yeah, fund our allies genocides! Yay! 🥳

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why do you want our social media to mirror China? That’s the real question.

I want Chinese companies face exactly the same hurdles in the west as western companies face in China. Applies to all economic branches, not just social media.

Oh yeah, fund our allies genocides! Yay! 🥳

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

[–] OftenWrong@startrek.website -1 points 8 months ago

In what way is taking a platform away from millions of Americans an acceptable way to do that? Yes, our taxes are funding a genocide and instead of listening to the droves of people protesting that they suddenly all get together and magically agree to ban tiktok. They can't agree to feed school children but still agreed to ban TikTok. The fact that you see it as retaliation is also hilarious because that's supposed to be illegal and they're still claiming that's not why they're doing it. Even you see through that bullshit on accident

Everything I said was relevant to my point. You linked the wiki to whataboutism and still used it wrong lmaooooo.