this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
18 points (75.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
461 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
18
Climate Change Is Killing Languages (thewire.in)
submitted 1 year ago by LollerCorleone@kbin.social to c/climate@slrpnk.net
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Forced migration is a major cause of language extinction. Environmental disasters are driving these displacements in the very regions richest in languages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crystal@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not?

I don't see why one would prefer having to learn and use a second language, which they're not as familiar with as with their first language, instead of just using their first language everywhere.

Having everyone always use the same language would not just ease direct communication, it would also help making (cultural and scientific) assets more accessible, because they wouldn't need to be translated.

Most people only watch movies in their first language. If the movie happens to initially be released in a different language, they only get access to that movie at a later time, if ever.

Same for many other things. Many people post recipes they like online. Often in their first language. People who don't speak that language will never get to see those recipes. (Unless they use a translation tool to understand the recipe, which most won't do. Most will just use a recipe written in their first language.)

This hinders cultural (and scientific) exchange.

I believe that the culture that is erased by deprecating a language is insignificant when compared to the cultural exchange lost to language barriers.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

cultural genocide

“Cultural genocide may also involve forced assimilation, as well as the suppression of a language or cultural activities that do not conform to the destroyer's notion of what is appropriate.”

[–] TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I encourage you to express this opinion on a native american reservation and see what happens.

[–] crystal@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I don't speak english as a first language either. I'm german. But I'd happily enact english as the official language in Germany, eventually replacing german altogether.