this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
849 points (90.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4321 readers
911 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 months ago (12 children)

I don't see how anyone would be safe from thieves in anarchy.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago
  1. Stealing, when it is done by most regular people is out of desperation. Decomodification of things necessary to live, and change in the socioeconomic system from a hierarchical one to a cooperative one would very likely lead to reduction in such crimes.
  2. I have a gun. (/s)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 months ago

You are misunderstanding why people become thieves in the first place, and how comparatively uncommon pure thievery is. The majority of theft is legal and is done in the name of capitalist profiteering. Not that break ins don't happen, nor that everyone will be a good person and accept a society of mutual aid.

Genuine theft will still occur. The consequences of something being stolen would not be the same within an anarchist society built on mutual aid. It is much easier to recover from theft when shelter, food, water, are all guaranteed things that you don't have to fret over. So the consequences will largely be interpersonal, grudges and disputes between people over less consequential things like valuables of some particular nature.

I am not of the opinion that violence of the community need be used on such a situation either. We aren't the police for Christ's sake. We can actually settle disputes in a proactive way that attempts to rectify the situation that precipitated the theft (maybe someone needs mental health help, maybe there are interpersonal issues) without kicking the shit out of anyone.

Violent crimes can be handled however the community sees fit. But things like theft or destroying someone's clothes should be handled proactively to ensure lasting solutions for everyone involved. Violence is a pretty bad deterrent for this kind of behavior.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The state doesn't keep you safe from thieves now. The police are a reactionary force that shows up after you've been robbed and then do nothing to help you. The most you get is a police report to refer your insurance company to, if your stolen belongings were insured.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

A very real risk of punishment by the state if you happen to get caught is what prevents theft. Your argument conveniently left that important part out and presented a straw man argument.

The rest of these comments talk about unenforced theft like white collar crimes and other class war-like theft. Which just reinforces the idea that only state-executed enforcement of law is actually any good at preventing theft.

[–] interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not needing to steal is what keeps most people from stealing, not fear of punishment.

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you think the homeless and hungry are the only people who steal?

High end crime happens ALL the time, and it's not out of necessity, it's out of the human condition of greed. Theft happens more often by rich individuals than it does by poor.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 4 points 6 months ago

It's a good thing the state takes that "high end" crime as seriously as smoking weed.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

mob justice did that before states existed or even humans. Now the state protects one class and loots the other. And guess what? thieves fear a mob more than the state. Things change, bad people find loopholes. How laws work needs to keep changing

Your first argument works in a perfect state, which will never exist. Your second paragraph makes no fucking sense.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So basically mob-justice.

Because witch hunts have never gone wrong and were always justified.

"This man loves other men, that's weird, let's kill him." - apparently no one ever

Also relevant meme: 4f16b8fa-df8d-4462-8eaa-c8e526a647fb

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 months ago (11 children)

"justice is not handed down from above and is therefore unfair" < words of the utterly deranged

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Homophobia comes mainly from the will to govern over other people, by shaming their natural and harmless sexual behavior, and is often dictated by some religion. As power structures like to cooperate, be they corporations, states, or churches; sometimes they like to push each others.

Before you ask: yes, some corporations are doing pride shit to appeal to a wider audience and legitimize their power in the modern world. But others like Xitter are helping state and church powers, as they have a common interest in keeping and expanding their own power.

If you also ask: many churches flourish when the state defunds social safety networks, as they can step in to replace them with church-based charities. I work in a state-owned retirement home, and I can first-hand experience it. Secularism is very compromised as churches had to step in to donate stuff, but that was never a charity, as they demanded the secular state of the institution to slowly eroding, because "religion provides comfort to the soul", and thus mental health care gets the axe first.

Authoritarians in general are excel in giving simple answers to complicated questions. Science? No, god did it. Our economical system is inherently flawed? No, a cabal of evil Jews that don't want to go back to the holy land did it. An anti-authoritarian project failed due to complicated reasons? No, they simply weren't authoritarian, and didn't have a good tyrant to stop the bad tyrants.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Theivery is a result of material needs unfulfilled, not some random genetic drive to go stealing.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You are free to steal. And the rest of the community is free to beat the shit out of you.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 months ago (5 children)

If that's how it works, then a stable anarchist society is impossible. The first asshole that comes along with a bigger gun than everyone else will have it right back to a dictatorship.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The community will band against the dictator as much as the thief

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They most likely follow the dictator, at the very least to sate their blood thirst.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Their "blood thirst" of not wanting thieves and murderers in their society? You realize that our current society is orders more "blood thirsty" than what we describe but only that you hide the violence through the police and the brutal wars and genocides against other nations?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

You’re making their point for them

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The free market will regulate itself! We’ll all have open and fair access

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You’re at the magical thinking “And then of course we will all…” crutch that a lot of philosophies lean on

Capitalism: We’ll deregulate and open the market to everyone, and then there will be “perfect competition” in a “free market”

Communism: We have state socialism until society is prepared, and then transition to communism

Anarchism: We won't have a central authority to prevent aggression, obviously we will work together as mutual interest aligns. And 100% no roving bands of raiders or warlords will ever ruin our society!

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We won’t have a central authority to prevent aggression, obviously we will work together as mutual interest aligns.

Yes, by definition that's how anarchism works. If if wasn't like this, it wouldn't be anarchism. Not sure why this is a difficult concept to handle.

And 100% no roving bands of raiders or warlords will ever ruin our society!

Nobody said that external dangers are not a potential issue, but the plan is to oppose them. Not a difficult concept to grasp either.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I have fringe anarcho-syndicalist politics, I understand the theory. I also understand that nothing exists in a vacuum, and while our happy anarchy-commune/whatever of 3,000 aligned people may build mutual aid tranquillity in our area, others may not. And those others may choose banditry, and your stuff instead of working for food.

So our commune/syndicate/etc form a defensive structure/organization to stop/prevent them - you just created a military/police class of “most equals”. Who will need a command structure for doing the ‘gun/bat meet aggressor’ functions, and some kind of special remit from the community. Or we say no dedicated force and the classes it brings, and use the irregulars/militia model instead. Which has so many issues on so many different aspects that’s it’s not worth me typing out.

Ffs go read Hobbes’ Leviathan

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

This, but much more importantly - when everyone's needs are met, and there is no hierarchy to try and get to the top of at the expense of others, people will have no reason to do shit like steal in the first place.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And what about the long road it takes to get to everyone’s needs being met? How will you ever get to that point? It doesn’t just happen overnight.

That may be no reason to do shit like that once everyone’s needs are being met, but there will be until you get to that point, and because of that, there’s no reason to think you would.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

You do realise ambition and greed are two sides of the same coin. Yes, resource scarcity effects this, but there will ALWAYS be people who want more

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thats why were actually in a “anarchy always has been” meme.

We are free to ignore the law and to object any direct order.

We are free to join a police force and protect the state, to join a police force and kill a civilian, free to take a firearm and kill a police officer, free to be killed by a police officer

We are free to organize institutions and support those.

You are free to join a line of thinking which brings you to a state of servitude.

You are free to comply, others are free to hurt you based on but also regardless of what you do.

Anarchy always has been, always will be.

Sooner we realize how inevitable it is the quicker we can overcome the hurdle and to accept that: Only by also helping others can we truly better ourselves.

load more comments (6 replies)