this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
418 points (95.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21272 readers
422 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    418
    If we had parties (lemmy.world)
    submitted 7 months ago by Waffelson@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] jack@monero.town 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Didn't appimage bundle all the dependencies inside it? That leads to way more taken disk space cuz of duplicate libs

    [–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

    I know this, but it's still way lighter than flatpak. (the required app depencies size <<< whatever the hell flatpak downloads)

    An app image that weighs a few hundred megabytes ( it's often less) becomes several gigabytes as a flatpak. I can download more than a dozen of appimages and it still would weigh as much as a single flatpak. I think it's just that my use case require me to have a handful lightweight apps in their latest version and the rest can be managed by the OS.

    [–] jack@monero.town 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

    Yes, the first flatpak is big cause you have to download the runtime (most common dependencies you will probably need anyways in the future). The majority of other flatpaks you will download will use the runtime you've already downloaded so those flatpaks will be lighter than the appimage variant

    [–] uis@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago

    Solution to too many package managers: two more package managers