Technology

59533 readers

3106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Why I Lost Faith in Kagi (d-shoot.net)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

via https://www.osnews.com/story/139270/do-not-use-kagi/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I read the article, and nothing in there seems to be a valid criticism of Kagi as a search engine. It's all about the founder not understood GDPR, or how Kagi wasted money on free t-shirts, or the writers personal opinion on AI.

This is largely an opinion piece. It has merit as such, but please don't take this article as factual journalism.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the author makes that clear early and repeatedly and it isn't ever framed as anything else than a walk through their thought process. I'm surprised you even felt this comment necessary. The article anchors heavily on privacy as a focus, and if you don't care about that so much then all you have to worry about is a company that spends a couple hundred k of their startup money on t-shirts.

So...even if their search is perfect, and you don't care that they really just want to charge you for search while they use you to train their AI, it is a paid service, so criticism of their ability to manage money is valid as an overall product review too though.

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you. I just felt it necessary to inform those that read comments and not the article itself. Especially because (here's my opinion) I feel that if you don't pay for a product, then you ARE the product. Even if Kagi isn't perfect, the payment model should be supported to foster this kind of internet.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I feel that if you don't pay for a product, then you ARE the product. Even if Kagi isn't perfect, the payment model should be supported to foster this kind of internet.

I agree with you, and I would just balance your statement out a bit and say that while the payment model should be supported, we should be wary of weak business models or predatory marketing that open up the door to just a different flavor of enshittification.

[–] 0oWow@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah I had to stop reading because they started bashing the people behind Kagi instead of the actual product.

The product has been working great for me. As for the founder, well I'm minding my own business.