Technology

59342 readers

5233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Sanity checking an idea for editing yaml without wanting to throw my laptop out the window (lemm.ee)

submitted 7 months ago by flashgnash@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Often find myself getting frustrated editing yaml, and it seems to be used everywhere for some reason I cannot fathom

I have an idea to write an editor plugin that will, when opening a yaml file, convert it to json (or some other less painful configuration language), then convert back on save. I don't know enough about yaml syntax to know if that's possible or if there's some quirk that makes them not completely cross compatible

Or alternatively if it exists a better CLI tool for editing yaml than just a normal text editor because I'm getting sick of pasting in a block of yaml and then having to fix the 8 indentation errors that somehow spawn from that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I think the difference is that it sounds they are just looking for something JSON-like, just enough to edit and save a change. It might not need to be valid.

[–] wisplike_sustainer@suppo.fi 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, a new not-a-markup-language, only human readable and editable, and objectively better than its predecessor? Well, it's all according to tradition. I believe YAML got its start the same way.

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

That's hilarious. I didn't know that

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No, I was thinking of actual JSON because it makes it easier to write a plugin (just use built in libraries to import and export configurations)

That said I suppose I could use the built in library and then re-inject comments after the fact

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, my mistake. Disregard me then.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not a terrible idea to add bits into the JSON but it makes it much harder to program, going for a quick and easy fix here rather than writing my own parser

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe a 3rd file would work? You could add all of the relevant data there and when translating between one language or the other it would prune any comments or unsupported features as the output is generated.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My plan is not to have multiple files at all and only have the JSON be in memory, or at least if there is a second one have it be temporary and deleted on exit

The problem with the approach of having an intermediary format is I need to create the intermediate format, and given yaml starts for yet another markup language that doesn't seem like a good idea (also a ton of effort to reinvent the wheel)