this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
964 points (96.2% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1136 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IPs change constantly, MAC is per network device (a laptop with Wi-Fi and wired has two different MACs), so you would need to be able to have a list of MACs and MACs can be easily spoofed so thats a whole other set of issues.

[โ€“] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair.

๐Ÿค” I worry what will happen once unique identifiers are integrated into chips.

[โ€“] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another interesting thought about MACs and any other chip-based IDs that get floated in the future. Spoofing aside, while MACs are supposed to be unique, there are a lot of dodgy mfgs that just burn the same MAC or set of MACs into entire batches of chips at a time. If a new standard was announced, it would be interesting to see the results of orgs trying to take advantage of the ID while shady mfgs continue to not give a flip.

[โ€“] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

๐Ÿค” In principle, you could just order a chip from a manufacturer with a specific ID tag so you could mimic someone you hated, or steal their shit, or otherwise fuck up their lives under such a system.

Hrm. ๐Ÿซค I admit that's pretty problematic.

The vast majority of ethernet devices can be set to use any arbitrary mac address