Interesting Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
- !technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
- !europe@feddit.org - News and information from Europe.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
view the rest of the comments
I promise I'm not a swifter or whatever they're called, but "at least" Taylor has to "work" for it, if a major part of it comes from selling and performing songs? right?
Like I agree "billionaires shouldnt exist" - but she's not high on my list of cruel offenders.
There's no ethical way to become or stay a billionaire. Swift is among the best of the worst, and typically uses her spotlight to spread a positive message, but that doesn't undue the unfathomably selfish lifestyle she lives.
So, while significantly less evil than other billionaires, she's still a billionaire, and thus evil.
How so? Genuine question.
It's the messaging. She has a ridiculous amount of fame, and uses that spotlight to encourage others to do good - and her fans do listen.
Most billionaires live that unfathomably selfish lifestyle while overtly giving society the finger.
Don't get me wrong - that whole spectrum is a subset of evil, but even it has its degrees of better vs worse.
She just says nice things? That's it? I'm completely ignorant on celebrities or pop music. I find that WP has a page on the "Political impact of Taylor Swift"
It sounds she is no different from a corporation putting a rainbow flag to their logo for pride month. I mean, it's something. One shouldn't be too cynical. But it's also kinda normal.
She's donated quite a lot:
https://www.billboard.com/lists/taylor-swifts-charity-donations-gifts-timeline/100k-donation-chiefs-parade-shooting-victim/
Now to be completely honest, with all her insane wealth, the amount she gives is proportionally very very little. But at least she does something, I guess?
Not that I'm defending the multi-billionaire.
saying "not that I'm defending a billionaire" while defending a billion doesn't make you not defend them. she didn't just donate very very little. she donates almost nothing of her wealth every time regardless of whether it's a single person or the whole cause. she donates enough to make the news and no more.
Yup, that's pretty much it, that's how low the bar is for other billionaires. That's all it takes to make her "the best of a very bad bunch"
Surely that is not ALL she does to get that amount of money. I'd assume she has it invested like any other rich person, stock market, real estate, tax evasion, all the trimmings. Just because she maybe does "less" of it, does not make her a good person.
you think she became a billionaire with just her music? her entire person is a corporation these days. there are many stakeholders that are not Taylor Swift with money in this game. every billionaire worked for it. the asshole part isn't that they didn't work for their money; it's the fact they hoard this wealth without legitimate, worthwhile return to general society aside from they taxes they actively avoid paying.
Billionaires do not labor for the oceanic majority of their money.
Her shows are actually an insane amount of work, and it's obvious when you watch them. My wife is a huge fan, myself not so much, but I can at least admit that her talent is undeniable.
She does 3-hour shows Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, then does it again the next week, and she's been doing that for over a year. It's honestly nuts.
And even between all those shows, she's releasing a new album. If anyone actually works for her wealth, it's Swift.
Hard disagree. She's worth something but it ain't billions.
No one should be worth billions. :(
Where's my billion dollars for working a normal amount of hours?
Yeah, no one should be a billionaire but she is putting in some work. I could not do what she does and I respect her for it, even if I categorically disagree with the concept of someone accumulating that much proportional wealth.
I guarantee you the average carpet installer works harder and is more deserving of billions. I'm not saying she doesn't have talent or doesn't work hard but the money that goes to her and other billionaires could actually help society but instead becomes a useless horde or pays for yachts and jewelry.
And so it goes. People hate the big picture but every detail is fine. The mosaic won't change while you keep every stone in place.