this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
485 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

31954 readers
564 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As a side note, here’s what Wikipedia says about the frog experiment:

“While some 19th-century experiments suggested that the underlying premise is true if the heating is sufficiently gradual,[2][3] according to modern biologists the premise is false: changing location is a natural thermoregulation strategy for frogs and other ectotherms, and is necessary for survival in the wild. A frog that is gradually heated will jump out. Furthermore, a frog placed into already boiling water will die immediately, not jump out.[4][5]”

Your point still stands, but you might want to consider switching to another metaphor next time.

Source: Boiling frog

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also you could feed two birds with one scone by choosing a less violent metaphor...

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Love it! Such a wholesome alternative.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I've never looked it up :)

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Neither did I until one day I stumbled upon a video that explained the misguided experiments that were behind the saying. Just today I started reading about it on Wikipedia and found that juicy summary.

There’s a pretty good reason why we have ethical restrictions and peer review with modern science.