this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
344 points (100.0% liked)

196

16257 readers
2879 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
344
Can't make money off of me if I don't exist rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by MashedTech@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Positive" eugenics is also eugenics, i.e. nations that want more (insert racial or ethnic group) and encouraging those groups to reproduce are engaging in eugenics.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i don’t disagree but positive eugenics is literally not the topic at hand that’s why no one had brought it up

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The OP isn't about eugenics of any sort. No one was talking about (negative) eugenics either until someone shoehorned it into the conversation.

I think it is intellectually dishonest to mention one type of eugenics while completely ignoring the other type, hence my bringing attention to a topic which has already been broached.