Or they are Chinese, and pick non-authentic Chinese names so people wouldn't suspect them? I don't think looking at the name can be a great way to identify the source.

This attack is clearly sophisticate: the attacker(s) are probably well-trained in obscuring their identity to not reveal much info from their name picks. Say, just use a random name generator.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Except it is a Chinese name, as Cantonese is spoken in China. Lots of speculation here by people missing vital information.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The name is suspicious because "Jia Cheong Tan" uses two different romanization of Chinese used in different regions. "Jia" and "Tan" seems to be pinyin, which is commonly used in the mainland; yet "cheong" uses probably Wade-Giles which is used in Taiwan.

OP seems to suggest cheong is Jyuping, which is used as a romanization for cantonese, but according to wikipedia, "eong" is not a final for Jyuping. So I don't think this is Jyuping.

disclaimer: I don't know a lot about Jyuping or Wade-Giles, so everything I put out is from wikipedia.

See: