UK Politics

3091 readers

105 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

197

Conservatives set for worst election result yet, research shows (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The referendum wasn't on whether or not we wanted Proportional Representation.

It was do you want the current system or do you want to go over to STV. PR was never on the table.

STV is basically the exact same issue we currently have but slightly more complicated it doesn't really solve anything.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is there a specific proposal for PR? What does that look like? Abolishing constituencies entirely or merging them in fives or something and voting proportionally within that or something else entirely?

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That why Mixed PR, or even better Ranked Mixed PR, would be an easier switch, as well a better system than pure PR.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What is why what? There is no claim in the post you're responding to. Only questions.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

With PR you lose local MPs. With Mixed Member PR, you keep local MPs. Using rank/score voting, improves that local representation.