this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
504 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2370 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

no offense but why did you phrase this as though you disagreed lol the graphic in the comment clearly lays out the same distinction just in a different way

In an additional layer of complexity, the gender with which a person identifies does not always align with the sex they* are assigned at birth, and they may not be wholly male or female.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not disagreeing with the information in the picture, I'm reiterating it to someone who's use of language showed they either phrased themselves poorly or don't yet fully understand the distinction between "sex" and "gender".

Clarifying.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ok gotcha personally to me it looks like they get it and typed a funky short comment but you do you πŸ‘

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"many intersex possibilities on the gender spectrum" is "funky"", yeah.

"intersex possibilities" don't exist on the gender spectrum, because the gender spectrum is about gender and not about sex, which has it's own (albeit more polarised) spectrum.

Hope that makes it clear (although I thought I made it clear that was what I was objecting to in my earlier comment)

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

i guess i gave them a more charitable framing of their comment like: β€œthere are many possible states of being intersex; individuals of all sexes can find themselves anywhere on the gender spectrum regardless of sex”

without hearing what they meant, both your framing and mine are valid given such a short comment i just didn’t immediately see yours at first. cheers πŸ₯‚

[–] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

For what it's worth thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt. Given that this whole post is about trans folks I think sex, sexuality, and gender are all applicable topics (with gender spectrum focal when talking about trans). I do understand the difference. To defend the person who wants clarification, perhaps I could have framed it better and I'll change it to "and the gender spectrum" instead of "on the gender spectrum". It's one word and what is meant is pretty apparent to anyone who reads the article or looks at the expanded graphic - which addresses concepts of sex, sexuality, and gender and explicitly uses the term "gender spectrum" when talking about trans choices/identity.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago

no problem! language is the key thing that trans people need to understand and represent themselves and so any and all discussion towards modeling language to support that need is a positive :)

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's important to understand the difference between sex and gender. Even within the trans community very few people understand the difference.

Gender is about societal roles, whereas sex is about biology. You can reject your societal gender role without wanting to change your body, and you can want to change your body while embracing your gender role.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago

see the rest of the comment chain; the discussion came to this understanding already