this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
170 points (98.3% liked)

science

14362 readers
457 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Colorado River has about 19% less volume than in the year 2000.

Researchers have quantified just how much water the agriculture industry in the Western U.S. is taking from the Colorado River, one of the most important river systems in the region.

More than half of the Colorado River's total annual water flow is being used to irrigate agricultural land, according to a paper published Thursday in Communications Earth & Environment.

Waters from the Colorado River have not reached its delta in the Gulf of California for more than 50 years because nearly every drop is being consumed as the waters flow south, Brian Richter, president of Sustainable Waters, a global water education service, senior freshwater fellow at the World Wildlife Fund, told ABC News.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with you on anything except the lawn thing.

Fuck those lawns. Keeping a 18th century style neat French lawn while living in a desert is not a good use of water.

Have a meadow instead. Keeps the water better and adds to biodiversity.

But yeah fuck those corporations. John Oliver had a good episode about water:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtxew5XUVbQ

I personally believe traditional agriculture has to shift towards more hydroponic settings. The water savings are crazy. Yeah there are a lot of problems can't just change fields into hydros, but....

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree from a general fuck lawns perspective. I hope to never rake another leaf or mow another blade of grass in my life.

In the context of my argument, though, I'm complaining about the propaganda tactic involved. They're manipulating the public by using a subject that brings up outrage already (lawns are bad is part of it, but the bigger part is pitting the poor against the not as poor but definitely not really wealthy) in order to draw attention away from the real issue.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, corporations pushing responsibility to the consumer. Same old annoying as fuck song.

Sean Locke on Climate Change