this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
46 points (70.5% liked)

World News

38583 readers
1780 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd like to see that study really. The sheer number of small animals (including bugs) killed is extrmely high when it comes to corporate agriculture. Toss in the migratory patterns thrown off and it would be interesting to compare environmental impact of consuming bugs for protein instead of just fruits/vegetables.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have concerns with plant agriculture, they are magnified when producing animal products

1 kg of meat requires 2.8 kg of human-edible feed for ruminants and 3.2 for monogastrics

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211912416300013

So your theory is that livestock (as in cows, sheep, etc which they talk about in the article) have the same impact as bugs?